This makes no sense. The "Government", in this case the DoD does not have the staff and people to do "government-operated asset". Not only they do not have the

This makes no sense. The "Government", in this case the DoD does not have the staff and people to do "government-operated asset". Not only they do not have the headcount, they do not have the expertise. This means that the only ways for them to properly "take control" are to spend several years to develop a plan, hire, knowledge transfer, and such to do it with all DoD employees; or outsource it to a another contractor. Option one makes things outdated by the time it matures (if it ever makes it to completion), and option two does not achieve the purported goal. So, what is the idea here? Is it just sabre rattling?