You left out the other part of the quote > at least as far as the consumer is aware and in theory for how it’s supposed to work. Costs to deliver are one thin

You left out the other part of the quote > at least as far as the consumer is aware and in theory for how it’s supposed to work. Costs to deliver are one thing, what the consumer ends up paying if they are low income is another. Across the board, controlling for state-by-state variations, poor folks aren’t (supposed to) be paying premiums in cost or quality on their water/heating/sewage. Often, they are subsidized. This law proposes pulling the internet into that basket of approaches. Seems good to me.