Great commit indeed. lots of context information. that's gold. The worst I've seen are dozens of tiny commits pushed to the master branch directly. If you want

Great commit indeed. lots of context information. that's gold. The worst I've seen are dozens of tiny commits pushed to the master branch directly. If you want to find out what took to implement a feature, good luck. I'm a fan of tiny commits during code review but afterwards I prefer to squash everything in a functionally relevant commit. It makes git archeology much easier.