2 ms·
I’m unclear how you’re linking private well houses (rural, have the money to drop a well, live off public utilities by choice) to lower income urban-ish neighb
by dogman144 3y ago
I’m unclear how you’re linking private well houses (rural, have the money to drop a well, live off public utilities by choice) to lower income urban-ish neighborhoods. Have you ran into a lot of septic tanks and well houses in urban LA?
Edit - just going to expand this to we’re talking about the consumer costs, not the price to deliver. So, low income consumers within utility systems (ie live in a city like LA) usually have subsidies for every other utility they get - water, heating, gas. It is viewed as inhumane to shut off heating in the winter, for instance. Tech industry and their enablers forced life to run through the internet, but no, that development didn’t turn the internet into a public utility… for sure. That same internet that the US govt by and and large developed and handed over to private sector later. Libertarian market-based technology politics love to forget where the industry came from in the first place, and the role it plays now in people’s lives.
- lupusreal 3y agoThere are poor neighborhoods in rural areas; these cannot receive utilities at the same price a offered to neighborhoods in more ideal locations. The price of a utility hookup doesn't depend on how wealthy you are, but can nevertheless vary from neighborhood to neighborhood and in some cases poor neighborhoods will be more expensive to serve than some wealthy neighborhoods. This isn't normally considered some sort of great injustice, it's just practical reality.
- dogman144 3y agoYup, I live rural, used to live urban. And regardless of cost to deliver, low income rural utilities gets subsidized in some form when it hits the consumer. Which is what this law in LA seems to be proposing.