4 ms·
> It even cited case law of Supreme Court precedent in District of Columbia v Heller, Caetano v. Massachusetts, and NYSRPA v Bruen in various motions to dismiss
by Filligree 3y ago
> It even cited case law of Supreme Court precedent in District of Columbia v Heller, Caetano v. Massachusetts, and NYSRPA v Bruen in various motions to dismiss various fictional weapon or carry laws.
Did you confirm that the citations exist, and say what it claimed?
- rietta 3y agoIn these cases, yes they are very real and what was claimed in summary seemed to pass the smell test. I actually read the cases.
- tomjakubowski 3y agoJust curious, are you a lawyer?
- tczMUFlmoNk 3y ago> While […] I am not myself an attorney […]
- rietta 3y ago@omjakubowski I am not an attorney, as I stated in the post, just a hobbyist playing with this software. I have a passing understanding of many legal issues just based on life experience and reading case law for understanding and advocacy purposes. I have got to say, Supreme Court rulings can be surprisingly easy for a law person to follow if you read carefully like a programmer would. There will be different parts. There is the holding which is the actually ruling that is made and dicta which translates to "other things said." The justices write very clearly.