4 ms·

Generative art has a texture and style problem where you can tell immediately it was AI generated and it will be associated negatively immediately

• jasonjmcghee 3y ago
  Have you been watching midjourney 6? It doesn't. Its output is crazy. It's crossed uncanny valley
  • m3kw9 3y ago
    You can still tell because they are mostly closeups and blurred bg that seem a bit too professional and touched up. If you have a big scene asking to do too many deats, you will start to see those “horror” morphs. They are getting close though
• kccqzy 3y ago
  When I use Bard to generate images, the style seems consistent. They all look like a low-effort painting, or those pre-computer-age advertising photos. Even when I use keywords like "photorealistic" or mention camera models in the prompt, the image still has that style. I don't hate the Bard look, but certainly other image generators are much more flexible in terms of style. I find this to be a big misstep. Image generation is inherently more fantastical than text generation, and dialing up the creativity here is really essential, unlike text generation where it could be derided as hallucination.