4 ms·
I certainly did not mean to be obnoxious to and I offer my apologies for annoying you. You seem open to the discussion of aesthetic concerns, but perhaps not t
by epistasis 3y ago
I certainly did not mean to be obnoxious to and I offer my apologies for annoying you.
You seem open to the discussion of aesthetic concerns, but perhaps not the premise that these concerns only seem to matter for solar? Or was it merely the way I made my point? I didn't mean this comment to target you, but the idea of aesthetic concerns being a blocker for buildings, but rereading I could see that it might be ambiguous.
- cxr 3y agoIt's a great example of someone thoughtlessly dumping energy into a system in a way that (a) frustrates the people working towards the same thing you are and (b) leaves those you oppose unscathed. I.e. not just annoyingly unproductive but outright counterproductive. > You seem open to the discussion of aesthetic concerns I am not. That's why the questions I asked were targeted at crafting a way to sidestep/neuter the aesthetics debate entirely and rendering opposition moot.