4 ms·
What you're saying is the market-share of the AI version that does not involve additional exploitation of minors in its creation is going up over time. The evi
by oatmeal1 3y ago
What you're saying is the market-share of the AI version that does not involve additional exploitation of minors in its creation is going up over time. The evidence is increasing that the theory is right.
If the AI version gets good enough, the supply of a substitute will real CP will go up, the price of real CP will go down, meaning there is less incentive to exploit real children.
- jdiff 3y agoThat's assuming a lot of things that are shockingly poor choices to assume. Like that the only reason children are exploited is for photographs.
- oatmeal1 3y ago> Like that the only reason children are exploited is for photographs. The unreasonable assumptions you assert I'm making are of your own imagination.
- jdiff 3y agoYour argument is built on assertions and assumptions that do not stand up to reality. It's not my imagination, its your own words. AI will do nothing to demand for CSAM because the premise is faulty.