Well when one side of the argument owns the channels of mass communication, and can wave the stick of dismissal at people who speak up publicly in favour. It's

Well when one side of the argument owns the channels of mass communication, and can wave the stick of dismissal at people who speak up publicly in favour. It's not hard to see how the public conversation gets biased. People who talk about unions being obstacles to progress that should be abolished are precisely as barbaric as those who advocate confiscatory taxation of the wealthy.