3 ms·
They are not splitting hairs. The GP comment was about the right toward anonymously sending telegrams and letters, then the response was about fraud, which mak
by soulofmischief 3y ago
They are not splitting hairs.
The GP comment was about the right toward anonymously sending telegrams and letters, then the response was about fraud, which makes no sense given the context of anonymity; you can't be fraudulently anonymous.