> As the article shows, it's much easier to mimick competence with the help of a chatbot. I don't think that's what the article shows. I think it shows that it

> As the article shows, it's much easier to mimick competence with the help of a chatbot. I don't think that's what the article shows. I think it shows that it's useless to ask "leetcode" questions and focus on the code produced rather than expecting candidates to walk through their thought process and show what tools they're using to aid it.