2 ms·
The interview is imperfect, very quick, and it's already hard to measure competence. As the article shows, it's much easier to mimick competence with the help
by rmbyrro 3y ago
The interview is imperfect, very quick, and it's already hard to measure competence.
As the article shows, it's much easier to mimick competence with the help of a chatbot. That obviously doesn't mean one actually is competent to produce good work in a real setting.
- sanderjd 3y ago> As the article shows, it's much easier to mimick competence with the help of a chatbot. I don't think that's what the article shows. I think it shows that it's useless to ask "leetcode" questions and focus on the code produced rather than expecting candidates to walk through their thought process and show what tools they're using to aid it.