3 ms·

Beyond your ad-hominem criticism on Neiman. I have used IPFS professionally and it is very slow. This issue is well known and gives an objective metric for the

by wslh 3y ago

Beyond your ad-hominem criticism on Neiman. I have used IPFS professionally and it is very slow. This issue is well known and gives an objective metric for the tool beyond idealisms. Extremely easy to check: [1] [2]. BTW, I come out with the paper "Is IPFS Ready for Decentralized Video Streaming?" [3] that could be an interesting read. [1] https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=ipfs+performance&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=ipfs+performance&hl=en&... [2] https://www.google.com/search?q=ipfs+performance+site%3Areddit.com&oq=ipfs+performance+site%3Areddit.com&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCDQwNzFqMGo3qAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 https://www.google.com/search?q=ipfs+performance+site%3Aredd... [3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39214634 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39214634

throwawaycities 3y ago
>ad-hominem criticism on Neiman What a bizarre thing to say. Neiman is a friend and inspiration. I specifically said I’m lucky to know him personally. Calling him an idealist isn’t an attack, it’s admirable. IPFS is fine for hosting blogs and static websites, I have 50 IPFS websites using a pinning service neiman cofounded. However, his blog post speaks for itself and his considerations are greater than whether IPFS/IPNS can host a blog. Nice work on your paper.