4 ms·
> That’s a bit silly of a thought experiment, because nothing survives it I don’t think that’s true. There are developments that really do constitute genuine p
by xanderlewis 3y ago
> That’s a bit silly of a thought experiment, because nothing survives it
I don’t think that’s true. There are developments that really do constitute genuine progress: for example, going from CRTs to LCDs. It’s hard to imagine a world populated by high-resolution, energy-efficient, colour-accurate flatscreens suddenly being replaced by the invention of a gigantic ugly box that performs worse on every available metric.
…and yet CRTs still exist as a ‘niche’ product. There’s a whole corner of the internet where people admire and collect them.
It may well be that ‘spatial computing’ or whatever you wish to call it is going to be a genuine step forward, but it’s also easy to imagine it might not be. And that’s not true for every technology.
- theshackleford 3y ago> that performs worse on every available metric. Except motion. In which twenty year old monitors on my desk make everything put next to it look abysmal by comparison.
- i5-2520M 3y agoTo be fair there are a few metrics where CRTs smash any LCD, mostly response time related, but OLED and MicroLED can bridge that gap...
- xanderlewis 3y agoFair point. But I don’t think the average consumer cares about those metrics.