> Maybe in the future everybody is going to use LLMs to externalize their thinking. But then why do I interview you? It will become a skill. In 1900 you'd inte

> Maybe in the future everybody is going to use LLMs to externalize their thinking. But then why do I interview you? It will become a skill. In 1900 you'd interview a computer (a person who does math) by asking them to do math on paper. Now you'd let them write some code or use software to do it. If the applicant didn't know how to use a (digital) computer, you'd negatively rate them. I don't love it, but we may reach the point where your skill at coaxing an LLM to do the right thing becomes a desirable skill and you'd negatively rank LLM-illiterate applicants. Looking at LLM quality, we're not at that point for most fields.