5 ms·
this makes sense... but I don't think they should have removed the audio jack from any of their product
by ijhuygft776 3y ago
this makes sense... but I don't think they should have removed the audio jack from any of their product
- ActorNightly 3y agoUSBC headphones make more sense. Unified port for all accessories.
- justworkout 3y agoIf that were to be the reasoning, the least they could do is provide 2 ports on phones so nobody needs a dongle to listen while charging.
- ActorNightly 3y agoPhones should have 2 ports, but Macs have 3 already
- inopinatus 3y agoThis is the sole reason I own a wireless charging pad.
- pzo 3y agosometimes you want to not only charge but also pass data via cable to macbook. Wifi has latency, airpods bluetooth also has latency. It the past it was easy when you could still connect iphone/ipad to macbook via cable and still connect headset for mic and speakers. I tested a lot of splitter adapters and they allowed only to use headset speakers (no mic) and charge (no data)
- YeBanKo 3y agoWhy though? Audio jack delivers pretty much all you need functionality for headphones and plenty of existing hardware. iPod Shuffle 3d gen was tiny, had only 3.5mm for data transfer and charging. They remove headphone jack in iPhone 7 and added USB-C in iPhone 15. So for almost a decade the only option was proprietary lighting or bluetooth, probably resulted in a significant amount of e-waste.
- ijhuygft776 3y agoWhat would make even more sense is a round USB plug to make it even easier to plug it in. I'm just tired of losing my Bluetooth earbuds
- pat2man 3y agoThe current MacBook Pro has an audio jack…
- willsmith72 3y agoyep, wouldn't have bought it without it. that and the lack of touch bar make the latest models awesome
- thesuitonym 3y agoYes but the GP's point still remains, they shouldn't have removed it from ANY device.
- arvinsim 3y agoThe lack of audio jack in my iPad Pro is the main reason why I abandoned music production on iOS and just do it with my Macbook Pro.
- Mistletoe 3y agoI think there’s only one real reason they removed the audio jack. This is so gross: https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/n5m2xp/oc_airpods_revenue_vs_top_tech_companies/ https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/n5m2xp/oc_...
- jwells89 3y agoI’m sure that removal of the headphone jack helped drive sales, but it’s worth remembering that AirPods were also some of the first bluetooth earbuds that were good enough for mass market appeal, and for usage with phones especially wires can get pretty irritating. A lot more people probably would’ve switched years earlier had other companies released bluetooth headphones on par with first gen AirPods.
- diebeforei485 3y agoThey were definitely motivated to sell more AirPods, but Bluetooth has been a clear quality of life improvement for most people (except when using the microphone, where Bluetooth has been a quality downgrade), and the 3.5mm jack takes up a lot of space inside phones. I'd have preferred they made a true replacement - a new wireless standard for example.
- ijhuygft776 3y agoI don't think I believe these numbers... I know they are way overpriced because I paid $30 for my "clones" but still... I also hate them because they are too easy to lose