4 ms·
> If the system could detect when low latency is important they could get away with a single kernel. I'm not sure this makes sense, especially in the context o
by mustache_kimono 3y ago
> If the system could detect when low latency is important they could get away with a single kernel.
I'm not sure this makes sense, especially in the context of modern power management. I mean -- even re: latency sensitive stuff, you probably don't want to be waking everything up at the granularity of a rt kernel.
- charcircuit 3y agoIf someone has a server and there are no humans interacting with it the the computer should realize that it is a good time to sacrifice latency.
- mustache_kimono 3y ago> If someone has a server and there are no humans interacting with it the the computer should realize that it is a good time to sacrifice latency. I think this is kinda the problem. Box: "Now is a good time to sleep for 1 ms." User: "Here I am and not so fast! This is supposed to be a rt kernel with a granularity of less than .002 ms."
- charcircuit 3y agoThere could be a sysctl to control this even.