2 ms·
Someone working in a lab doing routine blood work isn’t going to benefit from this. They aren’t doing anything novel just running the same assay a hundred times
by kjkjadksj 3y ago
Someone working in a lab doing routine blood work isn’t going to benefit from this. They aren’t doing anything novel just running the same assay a hundred times a week. A machine can do that job without ai today.
Someone working in cancer research is probably doing novel work on the other hand. They might not be doing routine assays but optimizing their own one off assay. Since gpts are trained on existing data it probably won’t be very useful for novel work outside of vetting the literature perhaps, but gpts botch that pretty badly in fact unfortunately. Lots of mistranslated information lacking correct context and not a lot of citing of sources. Better to just read human generated review articles to get a top down technical summary of the subject.