3 ms·
If they're just putting the question straight into GPT, then what benefit is the candidate bringing? I can use GPT myself, and for a lot cheaper than the cheap
by recursive 3y ago
If they're just putting the question straight into GPT, then what benefit is the candidate bringing? I can use GPT myself, and for a lot cheaper than the cheapest candidate.
- kmoser 3y agoIf the interview is for a position in which the candidate will be tasked with solving problems that ChatGPT is able to help with significantly, then they have just proven they are capable of doing the job. (If you have time to do this work yourself, why are you interviewing anybody at all?) Assuming the interview is to determine somebody's programming chops, without the benefit of ChatGPT, you'll have to ask questions where ChatGPT is little to no help. This was the conclusion of the article.
- seattle_spring 3y agoBut how will I know if they can implement a function to rotate a binary tree from memory?
- kmoser 3y agoWhy does it matter to you if they can do it from memory, if they can find the answer easily from ChatGPT? It's like asking "how can I tell if somebody knows the exact definition of a word without having to look it up?" If it's really important that they have that ability (e.g. because you will be asking them to perform other tasks which are not so easily solved by ChatGPT, or you simply don't want them using ChatGPT at their job for whatever reason), then you will have to devise an interview scenario where the candidate is incapable of using ChatGPT clandestinely, e.g. by bringing them into your office.
- seattle_spring 3y agoI was being facetious.
- n_plus_1_acc 3y agoYou evaluate whether they ceitically review the LLM answer or just take it at truth.