This is a pretty naive argument. People use AI to trivialize mundane tasks and make the more accessible. > If you're having AI write your email, it probably wa

This is a pretty naive argument. People use AI to trivialize mundane tasks and make the more accessible. > If you're having AI write your email, it probably wasn't that important. There's plenty of situations where extra politeness and wordiness has a real measurable impact on the outcome of the communication even when the actual information you're trying to convey could be compressed into one sentence. AI can wrap your thought into an appropriate amount of polite meaningless bullshit solving a real-world problem. It can do it much faster and better than I can. Even when the recipient knows or suspects it was composed with the help of an AI, the rules of engagement and social contract has been uphold successfully. Maybe this qualifies as "not important" in the mind of the author, but I'd argue that if the outcome of such emails can seriously affect your personal or professional life as it often does, it is important to me. > I don't want music recommendations from something that can't appreciate or understand music. Human recommendations will always be better. This is just plain demonstrably false. Humans recommend what they think you'd like based on an imperfect overly biased and incomplete simulation of you in their heads. AI doesn't give a fuck and recommends stuff similar to what it knows you like. > The images it generates are, at best, a polished regression to the mean. If you want custom art, pay an artist. Again, my mileage probably varies from the author here, but I have infinitely more scenarios where I don't want custom art but abundant and quick polished regression to the mean. AI can give it to me. It's silly to argue that it has no use. I generally agree that AI often doesn't deliver what overly enthusiastic marketing claims it does, but it still can do amazing things that are of real use to a lot of people.