There are also some of us who are just not great at demonstrating intelligence by narrating our thought process while under an adversarial spotlight with a time

There are also some of us who are just not great at demonstrating intelligence by narrating our thought process while under an adversarial spotlight with a timer running. I realize there are time/resource problems on the interviewing side, but I'd be happy to have conversations that are as long and technical as it takes for an interviewer to feel like they've found bedrock. Whether they pass me to the next phase or not, it's frustrating to spend 30 minutes or 3 hours trying to start a fire by rubbing wet twigs together and never get to walk away feeling like I've communicated more than a few percent of what I bring to the table.