How about a fourth category: Jobs where RTO and WFH are a draw, but if enough people WFH the company can save a large amount of money on renting an office. Th

How about a fourth category: Jobs where RTO and WFH are a draw, but if enough people WFH the company can save a large amount of money on renting an office. There have to be companies where the C-suite people can look at the rental expense and see "money that could go straight to the bottom line, and make us look good for doing it", right? If WFH/RTO is a draw, those companies ought to financially out-compete companies with power-tripping or incompetent managers that demand RTO, right? Smart leaders (don't laugh; there are a few) have to figure this out eventually, don't they?