This study may be more broadly applicable than just evaluating AI/LLM bio-threats. Why could it not be seen as a reasonable example or proxy for ChatGPT's effe

This study may be more broadly applicable than just evaluating AI/LLM bio-threats. Why could it not be seen as a reasonable example or proxy for ChatGPT's effect on any reasonably complex project? Seems like the result is that it provides a noticeable, but not statistically significant, improvement in the capabilities of the worker and team. So, quantifying a bit what we already sort of know, that it's really cool, impressive, and sometimes fun & helpful, but also a bit oversold.