4 ms·
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git&a=search&h=HEAD&st=author&s=google.com http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2F
by tonfa 14y ago
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git&a=search&h=HEAD&st=author&s=google.com http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Fl...
- cooldeal 14y agoThat doesn't include Google's modifications. From http://lwn.net/Articles/357658/ http://lwn.net/Articles/357658/ And there's a lot in that tree. Google started with the 2.4.18 kernel - but they patched over 2000 files, inserting 492,000 lines of code. Among other things, they backported 64-bit support into that kernel. Eventually they moved to 2.6.11, primarily because they needed SATA support. A 2.6.18-based kernel followed, and they are now working on preparing a 2.6.26-based kernel for deployment in the near future. They are currently carrying 1208 patches to 2.6.26, inserting almost 300,000 lines of code. Roughly 25% of those patches, Mike estimates, are backports of newer features. .. Linus asked: why aren't these patches upstream? Is it because Google is embarrassed by them, or is it secret stuff that they don't want to disclose, or is it a matter of internal process problems?
- tonfa 14y agoIf it's like android, it might be much closer to upstream now (your article is from 2009).