3 ms·

I think www.classes.cs.uchicago.edu/current/22300-1/lectures/FP_history.pdf is a better graph because it focuses more on functional languages and the layout is

I think www.classes.cs.uchicago.edu/current/22300-1/lectures/FP_history.pdf is a better graph because it focuses more on functional languages and the layout is easier to navigate.

dons 14y ago
a) it focuses /less/ on functional languages, since it includes many fewer. The nice one about this graph is that it is relatively complete.
- deleted 14y ago
  [deleted]
fogus 14y ago
That is a very nice graph. I was shooting for a more comprehensive graph, but as you see at the cost of comprehension.
- lukeschlather 14y ago
  Why did you include Fortran and Algol? I'm curious what warrants their inclusion, but not BASIC or ADA or a variety of other languages... they certainly don't meet the textbook definition of "functional."