2 ms·
The problem is that this argument is a logical fallacy. Threats to civic leaders are wrong. Whether or not they are good leaders does not change the wrongness o
by cjensen 3y ago
The problem is that this argument is a logical fallacy. Threats to civic leaders are wrong. Whether or not they are good leaders does not change the wrongness of the threats.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
- mardifoufs 3y agoThat's (whatboutism) not a logical fallacy. I meant it can be, but I don't see how it is in this case.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]