> This is the logic that is hard to dispute. Your arguments here are not addressing that > If you want to refute the theory you need to attack the main argumen

> This is the logic that is hard to dispute. Your arguments here are not addressing that > If you want to refute the theory you need to attack the main argument I did not mean to address any arguments for or against simulation. And definitely did not want to refute the theory. Where did you get that idea? I am just saying to be careful about assuming too much about the world that is running the simulation in case we live in one.