> We now know it was likely that "the virus was accidentally leaked from a lab" Do we? Why does this one always get used as the example of something being reve

> We now know it was likely that "the virus was accidentally leaked from a lab" Do we? Why does this one always get used as the example of something being revealed later as true and exposing the corrupt media when, as far as I'm aware, there's still no evidence for it. At best, there's a few people saying it's not been totally ruled out. Or non-scientists like the FBI suggesting it's likely. Why not point to the reams of climate denial or warmongering if you really need to question the media?