> That conclusion isn't rational. Neither in terms of the framing of the evidence that supports it, nor in terms of the logic that follows. Can you elaborate o

> That conclusion isn't rational. Neither in terms of the framing of the evidence that supports it, nor in terms of the logic that follows. Can you elaborate on what exactly isn't rational? I laid out a chain of thought that can be attacked link by link, you've just made a sweeping claim with no backing arguments.