Non-sarcastic question: do you have a graduate science degree, in any field, and therefore were you taught how to evaluate evidence? Given that your post senti

Non-sarcastic question: do you have a graduate science degree, in any field, and therefore were you taught how to evaluate evidence? Given that your post sentiment rests on the concept of "best evidence". I'm not trying to call you out nor embarrass you (nor assuming that I could). I'm trying to examine, and highlight if warranted, how terms are being thrown around. Understand that claimed status as best evidence, generally speaking, hasn't a direct relationship to whether or not research is quality evidence.