4 ms·
If that employee was a contractor or freelancer, would you consider overemployment a problem? If the employee is underperforming it's totally unrelated conside
by fsniper 3y ago
If that employee was a contractor or freelancer, would you consider overemployment a problem?
If the employee is underperforming it's totally unrelated consideration. If not, this is a discussion of why you are employing one. To do a job for you or to sit in 8 hours for you?
You need to start thinking on why you are paying. If someone can fill in 10 jobs' requirements at the same time, none of the employers should be concerned. Or only be concerned why they need only 1/10th of that employee?
- frabjoused 3y agoIt only came up because the person seemed mentally unavailable, and would only do what was asked of them. Yes, I’m paying a full salary for initiative and responsibility.
- Kon-Peki 3y agoThe issue is less about whether what they did was right or wrong (I'll side with you and say that it was wrong), but that you've got so many potential ways to pay people yet not have them there (mentally and/or physically) that in-office or remote is like an independent variable.
- fsniper 3y agoIf that's the case, you are already considering this employee underperforming. Being in the office or being remote does not really change the fact.