3 ms·
I'm skeptical productivity would play a significant in the decision in the majority of the F500's and others who follow their lead. It's logical, of course, bu
by stcroixx 3y ago
I'm skeptical productivity would play a significant in the decision in the majority of the F500's and others who follow their lead. It's logical, of course, but if productivity was a focus, there are many other possibilities that could be explored/implemented, which rarely are. MBA run companies are full of waste and inefficiency.
I think it does matter to you and many others in terms of your possible opportunities. If less companies have a policy that allows remote work, the companies that are even able to hire you are less and your opportunities are more limited than they otherwise would be. Fishing in a larger pond is in your best interest.
I worked remote for years before covid, but I believe the way I earned that opportunity was by working in the office with those same people for a few years to earn their trust. Asking new potential employers who don't know me to trust me like that I think would result in fewer opportunities.
- randomdata 3y ago> MBA run companies are full of waste and inefficiency. They are, and they don't have longevity because of it. A company listed on the S&P 500 in the 1950s had an average lifespan of 61 years. By 2016, that had fallen to just 18 years. You can hide inefficiencies for a while, but the piper needs to be paid eventually. Productivity matters. The companies may not literally switch to a particular mode of work, but the market will eventually cull any company that is falling behind in productivity. The net result is the same.