> but "hyperconverged" isn't really what we're doing. This is fair, especially as it follows a discussion of how you're building at the rack level, which is mo

> but "hyperconverged" isn't really what we're doing. This is fair, especially as it follows a discussion of how you're building at the rack level, which is more like a mainframe than current "hyperconverged" offerings. Recommend others read the linked post.