5 ms·
Good point, there is currently no way to assess the quality of custom GPTs other than relying on aggregation effects of popularity (you can already review them
by singularity2001 3y ago
Good point, there is currently no way to assess the quality of custom GPTs other than relying on aggregation effects of popularity (you can already review them so reviews are coming soon). You can't even see if they are truly useful by accessing external APIs or if they are just custom prompts.
> these custom GPTs are unusable and unreliable
That's too harsh though. Sure of the millions of custom GPTs many are useless, but those that work do work reasonably well, why wouldn't they?
About conversations being slightly hit or miss: I guess that's inherent to natural language, it can be circumvented by writing the prompt carefully and knowing the limitations.
- skybrian 3y agoHow do you find the good tools? I don’t much want to play with this stuff myself, but might change my mind if I read some good reviews somewhere. Similarly, there are probably a zillion Unix command-line utilities that I could install, but I won’t unless I somehow hear that they’re useful for something I care about. A command line tool needs its own documentation, but also, other people need to vouch for it.
- tough 3y agoGrimoire's been my fav so far
- singularity2001 3y agojust tried Grimoire, but it appears to be an example of "not working as advertised"? Tried to publish a function to netlify, was deployed as static html??