4 ms·
Maybe it just wasn't used enough to justify its placement in the UI. I always used the URL cache: prefix. The few times I tried through the UI, I couldn't find
by gexla 3y ago
Maybe it just wasn't used enough to justify its placement in the UI. I always used the URL cache: prefix. The few times I tried through the UI, I couldn't find it. I'm fine with the prefix, just continue supporting it. Though these days, I use other cache services more than I use Google cache.
- hammyhavoc 3y agoIt's a classic cost-cutting exercise. See https://klse.i3investor.com/web/blog/detail/future_tech/2024-01-31-story-h-189430080-Alphabet_just_banked_3_0_billion_by_stretching_the_life_of_its_servers https://klse.i3investor.com/web/blog/detail/future_tech/2024... and https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/30/alphabet-googl-q4-earnings-report-2023.html https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/30/alphabet-googl-q4-earnings-r...