3 ms·

I'd like to hear what makes you think so, when a judge looked at the facts, heard arguments from both sides, and decided otherwise. Do you have additional facts

I'd like to hear what makes you think so, when a judge looked at the facts, heard arguments from both sides, and decided otherwise. Do you have additional facts they did not, or are you basing this off your own study of jurisprudence? Or is it just kind of a knee jerk reaction based on reading a headline and having feelings about it, or is it some fourth possibility I haven't considered?

goshx 3y ago
Because I, along other shareholders, voted for the plan, which you can find here: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000119312518035345/d524719ddef14a.htm https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000119312518... The reasons for voiding it are absurd. He did the almost impossible and met all milestones of the plan and brought TREMENDOUS value to all the shareholders. Had he not done it, his shares would not be worth that much.