3 ms·
Neither here nor there--when Apple needed Intel to ship a decent, performant core that didn't overheat and chew through battery life, they could not. Apple swi
by whynotminot 3y ago
Neither here nor there--when Apple needed Intel to ship a decent, performant core that didn't overheat and chew through battery life, they could not.
Apple switched to their own silicon, and life for their customers has radically improved.
Maybe Intel has a great E Core now. Good for them if they do.
- timschmidt 3y agoIt sounds like Apple just wanted to vertically integrate, to me. Which is a fine reason to do something. But doesn't require misrepresenting competitors or constructing a past which never happened. You do you though.
- evilduck 3y agoIntel laptops cant even sleep anymore. I have a 11th Gen Intel space heater that invalidates every claim you've made in this thread. People aren't stupid, we've owned these shitty Intel products for years, you're fooling nobody.
- jujube3 3y agoYeah, this is ridiculous. This guy is trying to claim both the Intel has good power consumption numbers, and that Apple should have added more fans to their Intel laptops. Has Intel discovered the secret of creating heat without using energy? Because according to the laws of physics I was taught, the need to festoon your computer with numerous fans means that... you're dissipating tons of energy.