2 ms·
Unfortunately no I didn't read the article you linked, I still don't see how this device collects any additional data over what is already available for other d
by methodical 3y ago
Unfortunately no I didn't read the article you linked, I still don't see how this device collects any additional data over what is already available for other devices in the Apple ecosystem. Anybody who has used a Mac, iPhone, or iPad has had HD cameras pointed at them.
To clarify, my point with this comment and my first one was never that data collection (and as far as I can tell mass surveillance as well to you?) was okay, rather that I don't see how this device captures any more data on a wearer than the other devices they likely own.
- schmorptron 3y agoI think GP's point was that it normalizes having cameras pointed at other people at all times while you're wearing it or similar devices. I see a much bigger issue in this regard with the meta ray ban sunglasses, since those will actually be worn by people outside. We already have cameras pointed all around public spaces, but this device category will increase that coverage to near ubiquity long-term. When you are in the presence of someone wearing this, you're being captures by 4 or more high-res cameras, in 3d, whether you want it or not.