4 ms·
Want to wash my monitor after reading this article... argh.
by soapdog 3y ago
Want to wash my monitor after reading this article... argh.
- jevoten 3y agoCan you point out the errors he makes, for those of us less familiar with US civil rights law?
- ZeroGravitas 3y ago> 94% of these positions went to people of color, 6% to white applicants. Well that's wrong for starters. It's a net figure which counts a white person retiring and a white person being hired as a no-op if you interpret it wrongly like he has done. Between that and the demographics of the young people applying for non-degree jobs (which far outnumber the higher level jobs) probably explains most of the stat.
- dudul 3y agoDHH is just using the Bloomberg article, he didn't make up the numbers. Where do you see that a white person retiring and a white person being hired cancel each other out? Yes, low level jobs contribute a lot to the final number, but the trend seems present at all levels presented in the report.
- jevoten 3y agoFrom what I recall of the discussion at the time, it's true - the Bloomberg article only looked at job growth, not all hires. Even so, only 6% of growth going to the 58% of the population that is white is highly skewed, and I don't follow how demographics of young job-seekers explains it.