I think many people agree that disinformation is a threat, but won't admit it. Because they know that anti-disinformation efforts will be (and have been) used t

I think many people agree that disinformation is a threat, but won't admit it. Because they know that anti-disinformation efforts will be (and have been) used tactically only to silence narratives those in power dislike, and not as a neutral, dispassionate tool of truth. Weak evidence will be considered as conclusive proof, or strong evidence dismissed as inconclusive, as convenient for the fact-checkers. For example, even though the police killings/homicides committed ratio is higher for Whites than Blacks, BLM is never cited as based on disinformation, nor are their protests during the peak of COVID cited as a risk. https://theintercept.com/2022/10/31/social-media-disinformation-dhs/ https://theintercept.com/2022/10/31/social-media-disinformat... https://greenwald.substack.com/p/homeland-securitys-disinformation https://greenwald.substack.com/p/homeland-securitys-disinfor... https://citizenjournos.com/2021/04/26/nobody-does-disinformation-better-than-the-bbcs-anti-disinformation-unit/ https://citizenjournos.com/2021/04/26/nobody-does-disinforma... https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-fmr-cia-chief-mike-morell-testifies-under-oath-that-biden-campaign https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-fmr-cia-chief-mike-mo... https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/2749593/disinformation-inc-meet-the-groups-hauling-in-cash-to-secretly-blacklist-conservative-news/ https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/2749593/disinformati...