3 ms·
"In name only" is an interesting way to say "literally re-engined 737s with minor tweaks to the airframe, in line with an incremental development". Again, the
by filleduchaos 3y ago
"In name only" is an interesting way to say "literally re-engined 737s with minor tweaks to the airframe, in line with an incremental development".
Again, the whole reason the "software cludges" were implemented in the first place is precisely because it's more or less the same "hardware". The entire problem is that the 737 MAX family is in fact made up of 737s when they should have been redesigned from scratch. It's baffling to me how one could come to the conclusion that they aren't 737s.