3 ms·
I think it is retaliation. Employees started pushing for WFH, raises, better work/life balance. Employers (especially bad ones) like to have control and so thi
by HumblyTossed 3y ago
I think it is retaliation. Employees started pushing for WFH, raises, better work/life balance. Employers (especially bad ones) like to have control and so this is to get employees back in line.
- rwaksmunski 3y agoYep, it's all about power.
- datadrivenangel 3y agoAssert dominance by forcing them to fire you for not coming in and arguing for constructive dismissal.
- barbazoo 3y agoI don’t know. Sounds good, but is there any data to back that up? “It’s all about power” or control sounds like such a cliche at this point.
- pm90 3y agoIts cliche because its true. In a certain sense its not all that surprising: execs hang oit with other execs. They go to the same sports games, vacation at the same spots, attend conferences etc.
- barbazoo 3y agoOk, so they're at the same sports games, vacation (really?), conferences. So what, do they hang out and brag how many of their employees work from the office? Is it embarrassing for one exec of their company allows WFH? How does this "power" show?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]