4 ms·
Why does the global population need to grow? What is wrong with only having 9 billion people instead of 10 billion?
by SamuelAdams 3y ago
Why does the global population need to grow? What is wrong with only having 9 billion people instead of 10 billion?
- nairboon 3y agoIt helps the economy, more people = more demand and bigger markets. Now one might ask why the economy needs to grow.
- romusha 3y agoCuz the old billionaires
- cjbgkagh 3y agoMore people is more demand and higher prices and depressed wages equals higher profits. Natalism is being pushed by corporatism. Plus the modern economy is a giant ponzi scheme and people don’t want it to collapse on their watch.
- HPsquared 3y agoOwners of land, and operators of various Ponzi schemes, demand it.
- safety1st 3y agoThose Ponzi schemes include practically everyone's retirement plans. Whether it's a tax-funded benefit or a private fund levered to the market it needs growth.
- cjbgkagh 3y agoThe assumption of continued economic growth is what makes the numbers in dodgy ponzi economic theory work. Society will have to go to ever increasing extremes to make it work. At some point the cost of that will exceed even the imagined gains and the economy will implode. Politically people don’t want their dose of reality so we’re stuck in a boom/bust business cycle of ever increasing amplitude. The rollercoaster we can’t get off. I think we’re already at the limits of what can be done and the social fabric keeping things together does appear to be at a breaking point.
- romusha 3y agoCuz the economy
- i_am_proteus 3y agoWe do not have a good way to run a society where elderly people substantially outnumber young people. A shrinking population is not necessarily a problem. A rapidly shrinking population is.
- MilStdJunkie 3y ago"A wild Correct Answer appears" Speaking as a "rapidly becoming old person" myself, something we always dodge around is that old people aren't good for a whole lot. I mean, you'll see, but I'd estimate I have about fifty percent the hustle, physically. Mentally, I'm just not as . . eh . . exuberant? I guess I'm slower, but I'm also not crazy. I don't work as hard on other people's dumb ideas - I mean, sure, I'll help out, sure, do what I can, but I'm not spending a week without sleep on it. I guess you get a good intuition for what's going to crash and burn and what's got legs. That's actually a negative in your employables. The Overlords want people to jump when they say jump, even if it's off a cliff.
- oliwarner 3y agoFunding pension and institutional investment on a pyramid scheme of infinite growth is definitely the problem. But this isn't something that can be gradually fixed. Capitalism —at least this version of it— has to go.
- friend_and_foe 3y agoHow do you take care of non productive old people with very few productive young people? You call it a pyramid scheme, I don't see how you socialize caring for old people in away that cannot be classified that way. Perhaps the solution is to take care of your parents and if someone didn't have the foresight to have kids they're on their own? Pyramid scheme averted.
- oliwarner 3y agoThat's not the pyramid I mean. It's too expensive to have kids because housing (and to a significant but much lesser extent fuel) prices are out of control. The infinite growth pyramid that's the problem is that banks, governments and pensions all rely on real estate doubling in value every 10 years. They have for decades but we're at a point now where people can't even afford rents in some places. The Welltodos in their 50s and 60s have hoovered up a large bank of properties in the past few recessions with a view they can sit back and make their 8%. It can't carry on. This euphemism, "global fertility" is the side effect that our economics is utterly unsustainable. And no, I don't have a solution.
- pixel_tracing 3y agoProjections and forecasts for entire sectors use the data to make decisions, for example China built so many homes in projections of population / census estimates, their source data turned out to be incorrect that’s why you see a situation like Evergrande.
- jejeyyy77 3y ago:facepalm:
- barrysteve 3y agoOur society was based on population growth. It's not that it needs to grow or doesn't need to grow. It's that the change to our way of life and economy is as big as ww2. Peter Zeihan does a good lecture explaining the impact.
- disambiguation 3y agoI like Bezos's argument for this. He always talks about "1000 Mozarts and 1000 Einsteins". If you consider that for every million born 1 will be a genius, and that having more geniuses is better than not, then it makes sense to max out your population.
- ponector 3y agoBut what is the point of new Mozart or Einstein if the child cannot get proper education and realize their potential? Next Mozart could be born a slave in Mauritania or work 12h in McDonald's to barely afford some food.
- disambiguation 3y agoOh yeah you're right. In fact I just remembered the sun is going to explode in 5 billion years so it's all pointless anyway.
- ponector 3y agoMy point is we as society should focus on quality, not quantity of everything and everyone.
- disambiguation 3y agoThat's not a point, that's dull edge. Quantity vs quality is a false dichotomy, both can and have increased over time. Further, a 1000 monkeys on a typewriter could never come up with general relativity. One genius can improve quality of life for everyone.
- ponector 3y agoAnd 10000 geniuses could improve nothing if they are born in slavery and have no education.
- Melchizedek 3y ago