3 ms·
Oh indeed, at least the presenter wasn’t stuck as a cat avatar. That would make the coincidental recurrence of connectivity issues even funnier, but shouldn’t t
by dpflan 3y ago
Oh indeed, at least the presenter wasn’t stuck as a cat avatar. That would make the coincidental recurrence of connectivity issues even funnier, but shouldn’t the authorities have received a copy of the video, devoid of “internet connection” issues? Or was it not in legal position to demand the artifact and just have it shown over Zoom?
- rsynnott 3y agoThey claim the NHTSA got one. However, if, ah, connectivity issues obscure the video of the Bad Thing in the meeting, and the Bad Thing is not mentioned in the meeting, then the chances of it being noticed even if a video was sent do decline.
- dpflan 3y agoTrue, I would expect someone to review the footage in entirety without the presenter biasing the presentation.
- rsynnott 3y agoI'm sure someone did. It may not necessarily have been someone who had attended the meeting and thus was aware that the key fact had not been disclosed in the meeting, tho. With stuff like this you want to be absolutely crystal clear what happened in your written and verbal reports. You can't just rely on a video that you may or may not have emailed over after previously showing it in such a manner as to obscure the key info.