Well, I don't think Gisin's mind is offended by non-determinism: > I argue that there is another theory, similar but different from classical mechanics, with p

Well, I don't think Gisin's mind is offended by non-determinism: > I argue that there is another theory, similar but different from classical mechanics, with precisely the same set of predictions, though this alternative theory is indeterministic and in the footnote he describes indeterminism to mean: > given the present and the laws of nature, there is more than one possible future Out of curiosity, why do you lean towards superdeterminism and not other deterministic interpretations of QM such as Many-Worlds or Bohmian mechanics?