4 ms·

Respectfully, I’m not sure what you are asking for. In-N-Out is only in a small fraction of the US so most people from the US wouldn’t know much about it either

Respectfully, I’m not sure what you are asking for. In-N-Out is only in a small fraction of the US so most people from the US wouldn’t know much about it either. I believe that’s why the GP comment provided a little more context which was more or less sufficient for me to understand the comparison.

ako 3y ago
Initially the In-N-Out example was made without explaining what it is, and even with the added context i think it doesn't really explain how In-N-Out differs from McDonalds. Their operations are better, what does that mean, how does that impact customers, how does that impact cost, etc.
- bogwog 3y ago
  If you ever go to one, you'll understand. They're like the Rolls-Royce of fast food burgers.
  - philwelch 3y ago
    I’ve been. It’s nothing special.
  - Nexxius 3y ago
    I wouldn't say Rolls-Royce, more like Lexus. Fuddruckers would be closer to Rolls quality as they actually allow for something other than well-done, preformed, meat pucks.
bombcar 3y ago
In-n-Out has saturated the southwestern coast, which is a pretty significant fraction of the United States. The key is they have an absolute ton of employees in the restaurant (a busy McDonald’s might have four or five, In-n-out can have double or triple that. I’ve seen other fast food with two employees, never an In-n-Out) and they work exceptionally hard on specific tasks. They also only deploy in areas where they’ve determined they’ll be able to keep the store busy enough.