> You say you can't comprehend how something can move from 1 to 2 discretely. I didn’t mean that, sorry if my words that induced you to believe so. What I wan

> You say you can't comprehend how something can move from 1 to 2 discretely. I didn’t mean that, sorry if my words that induced you to believe so. What I want to point out is that, to my mind, if I assume a discrete foundation of universe, on meta-cognitive level I must recognize it implies everything I experiment through my current attention might possibly be a just made up state without any compelling ontological relation to anything I can recall or think of. So, as far as I’m concerned, believing in continuity is just a lazy way to relax on a metaphysical Gordian knot. > It's faith either way. Yes and no. It’s probably easier to change scientific perspective to whatever model apply best for some purpose than to adhere to some philosophy about Nature.