2 ms·
A major factor was that Airbus launched the A320 NEO and die hard, lifelong Boeing customers showed interest and even ordered the Airbus offering. Designing a
by CaptainZapp 3y ago
A major factor was that Airbus launched the A320 NEO and die hard, lifelong Boeing customers showed interest and even ordered the Airbus offering.
Designing a completely new plane (which was considered for quite some time) would have taken far too long and Airbus would gave eaten Boeing's lunch in this important segment.
So, Boeing McGivered a solution and updated a 60s airframe for modern use.
To not having to recertify the plane they came up with a software hack, which they initially didn't even document and which far exceeded the capability of its original design.
This[0] is a fantastic read which will leave you with a "how the fuck could they ever do that"? feeling and makes you wonder why nobody went to jail for that
[0] https://spectrum.ieee.org/how-the-boeing-737-max-disaster-looks-to-a-software-developer https://spectrum.ieee.org/how-the-boeing-737-max-disaster-lo...
- tracker1 3y agoI'm somewhat curious as to what efforts to design a smaller, better fit engine closer to the original form/size with better fuel economy was tried. Combined with newer materials. It seems like the flight charismatics have changed so much that pilot recertification should have been required anyway. I have worked on eLearning courses for aerospace in the early-mid 00s but have forgotten mostb of what I learned in that domain back then. It was also mostly mechanic/diagnostic interfaces (ECU, etc)