> Choosing Linux is the opposite of choosing stability. I would argue that a close-source (at least before the leak), non-supported kernel is way more unstable

> Choosing Linux is the opposite of choosing stability. I would argue that a close-source (at least before the leak), non-supported kernel is way more unstable and risky than an open-source, still maintained one (some kernels are actively maintained through 2033). Bear in mind that the position was not about developing/maintaining the OS, but the applications that run on it.