3 ms·
Before this unusual rebranding, we had <strong>, another ridiculous attempt to add some kind of semantics (despite being essentially meaningless) to the <b> el
by infotainment 3y ago
Before this unusual rebranding, we had <strong>, another ridiculous attempt to add some kind of semantics (despite being essentially meaningless) to the <b> element, created during the insane excesses of the XHTML STRICT era.
<b> was, is, and always will be the bold text element. No one is going to die if there is some slight semantic meaning in your HTML.